Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cape Verde (Mars)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Victoria (crater). ✗ plicit  02:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Cape Verde (Mars)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Extremely minor Martian geographical feature, a minor escarpment of the less than 1 km diameter Victoria (crater), I just don't see how this warrants a separate article from the crater itself. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Victoria (crater) per nom. Agricolae (talk) 00:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak merge There are reliable sources on this page. However, it's a good idea to merge, I don't see why and how it warrants a seperate article, as what stated. I would tilt to the merge side about a degree.  Severe  storm  28  01:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge I've tried searching for pages on Cape Verde. While there are sources for it (including a NASA profile), the length of information tends to be very short. I think Cape Verde would be much better off as a subheading. — Okonomiyaki39 (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong merge The sources are logs from Opportunity (rover) and don't discuss Cape Verde in detail. This gives us about two sentences of content: The origin of the name and the fact the it was visited by Opportunity. This isn't enough for a standalone article and is best covered in the Victoria Crater article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.