Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cape serval


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Serval. The Bushranger One ping only 09:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Cape serval

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks like a hoax — WP:DEL6. I could not find any evidence that this subspecies is extinct. If the article describes the whole species, then it is a fork of Serval — WP:DEL5. Тилик-тилик (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 7.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Convert to redirect Not a hoax. If at least one other subspecies as recognized, then Leptailurus serval serval must be recognized. It looks like multiple subspecies are usually recognized (but there are some authorities that don't recognize any). But that's taxonomy, not encyclopedia building. I think it is rarely a good idea to have articles on subspecies; they usually differ from each other by minor details of range and morphology and can be easily discussed in the article on the species. That doesn't mean subspecies articles are automatically forks of the species articles; in rare cases, they may be appropriate. In this case, we seem to only have an article on one subspecies, so I don't think there's any great harm in turning the article into a redirect to Serval. If somebody does come along and create articles on other serval subspecies, then this could be restored. Plantdrew (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.