Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital Access Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 17:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Capital Access Network

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

At first sight this appears sufficiently referenced to verify notability. Dig deeper and you see that the references are not robust, many without significant coverage, some not actually about the org, and others not RS. Fails WP:CORP Fiddle   Faddle  18:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for nowat best until a better article can be made. Pinging tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I did patrol and tag this one, saw that the refs really didn't pass SIGCOV, and at least then some didn't pass anything. Looking now, it looks like a paid editing article with no genuine refs, just links to mentions.  They've had plenty of time to fix, I can assume this is as good as it will ever get, so delete. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 11:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.