Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital Index


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Capital Index

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The references here are mostly very poor. Many of them are primary sources or regulatory filings and license approvals related to the company. I do not believe the depth of coverage constitutes a "level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements" as required to meet WP:CORP. Uhooep (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Cyprus,  and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 01:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. No significant independent coverage aside from press releases. Written in a promotional tone. ‪雞蛋仔 eggwaffles (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 13:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.