Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital Subscription Fund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Capital Subscription Fund

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism; no sources; almost no Google hits. Biruitorul Talk 02:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  16:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is not Wiktionary.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   kur  ykh   05:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Seems obscure enough that hardly anyone has heard of this type of fund (under 100 ghits for "capital subscription fund"), so it could have been prodded. Also relisted twice... VG &#x260E; 08:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like a neologism to me with the three Google hits. Mvjs   Talking  09:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.