Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Capital com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a non-notable company that fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Being just the sponsor of Valencia CF does not assert notability. It should also be worthy of note that the article was created by a single-purpose account who is now indef blocked after clear signs of UPE were noted. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete it is very obviously been writen by a paid editor. and is not notable enough. also its sources seem biased. Clone commando sev (talk) 02:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete We've been here before, though with the dot-com dot in the title, so this is a wool-pull that hasn't improved in the least in the last two years on anything. If a mod could compare this copy to the 2018 version, we could have a G4 on our hands; also, I know broadwayworld.com has questionable source notability at best for entertainment articles, but why are we sourcing an article with a circular press release from that site?!  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I see said on the talk page that it doesn't meet G4 through their reading of the text...I still have removed the BR source though as utterly unintelligible.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I tagged this for notbility as I could not find a quality independent source that would meet NCORP. I didn't go for full AfD because the article implied it was the sponsor of Valencia CF (a major football club), however, my understanding now is that it is not the main sponsor, which is Bwin.  Had I known that then, I would have sent it to AfD. Britishfinance (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete too lazy to go look at the deleted version, but I doubt this version could have been an improvement. Subject lacks sufficient coverage to even think it is notable. And while I note the UPE possibility, I have seen some decent articles from paid editors. This is not one of them. Maybe someone less lazy could G4 it? -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 11:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Belay the G4. Ritchee333 already declined that. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 12:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed, when you have new references that post-date the last AfD, than that is strong grounds for a G4 decline imho. Britishfinance (talk) 12:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It was already acknowledged by Shirt58 a few days back that G4 was not appropriate, otherwise I might have tagged it as such myself. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt This is clearly not notable IMO. Especially since it is a shoddy recreation of an article that was also deleted for not being notable and has the same sources from it. It should be salted so we aren't just going through this again when it inevitably gets recreated a third time with an extra space or something. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt Non notable and recreation of a article deleted for non notablity 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't reach WP:NCORP... doesn't even make any steps towards it. Cabayi (talk) 15:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, and notability is not inherited from being a shirt sponsor of a notable club. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.