Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capo Geezy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. SNOW delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Capo Geezy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article reads like an advertisement. There's also this extremely long "Quotes of Capo Geezy" section. I also couldn't find many reliable sources for him. ‍ Relativity  03:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Bands and musicians, Bibliographies,  and Music. ‍ Relativity  03:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * This is not an advertisement. Capo Geezy is a artist who contributed to the state of Idaho in notoriety. He has 630,000 followers on Instagram and has collaborated with many famous rappers. Everything in the above stated is correct. 130.18.104.156 (talk) 03:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Huge Capo fan. https://www.reddit.com/r/capogeezy/comments/ygczv4/rcapogeezy_lounge/
 * His lyrics are published all over Genius. Not advertising Capo. He is at massive risk for confusion, due to the multiple Capo's and a page should be written about him and his contributions. Iamcapobroquard (talk) 03:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This article should stay up because it has potential to be founded and built upon over time, due to the fact he is early in his career and is known/famous worldwide. Although, he is not listened to much for his music besides a few songs.
 * https://www.instagram.com/capogeezy/?hl=en
 * He is a established figure on Instagram his main platform, due to the presence and success he has had and or to the risk of impersonation and the hundred or so fan pages of him. Iamcapobroquard (talk) 03:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * He is known for posting long quotes on his Instagram Stories and Snapchat Stories @iamcapogeezy, that are worth of note when writing about him, life and outlook. Iamcapobroquard (talk) 03:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Iamcapobroquard Are you related in any way to this account? User:Iamcapogeezy ‍ Relativity  04:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No Sir. Iamcapobroquard (talk) 04:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe he tried to make a page about himself in the past, when he first became known in Europe based on what he posted in August of last year. At this point, I believe a article should stand about him, due to the relative nature of his achievements, contributions, with the mass amount of people knowing who he is and the potential for a longer and expanded page depending on what he does in the future. Iamcapobroquard (talk) 04:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. I already fear what I may be getting myself into but here we go. The article is 100% promotional and a disaster and within minutes of its nomination, the AfD discussion is being bludgeoned by multiple accounts with a clear conflict of interest. No sources found to indicate notability and no sources listed in the article are worth anything in that regard. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I may also suggest an SPI. Not sure if we should go that far but it's a suggestion. At the least an admin needs to see this. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet investigations/Iamcapogeezy. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Bishonen has been contacted out my familiarity with them. Wow; full-blown brigading and likely sockpuppetry has now consumed this thread. Complete lack of understanding or care on the part of every IP address that has commented so far. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * ● Retain/Preserve. Article is not self promotion, and most conflict of interest has been removed. Meeting the guidelines for a neutral perspective. Dantecolombo4 (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The presence and activity of a dedicated following for Capo Geezy, as evidenced by edits and interactions on his Wikipedia page, serve as a tangible marker of his notability and relevance in the public domain. Capogeezy90 (talk) 16:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, Capo. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @AllTheUsernamesAreInUse None of these accounts are him, He's got a lot of impersonators, and that is why he is verified on social platforms. Dantecolombo4 (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Uh huh. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - An WP:BEFORE search on this "influential figure in the music and entertainment industry, celebrated for his pioneering work" reveals his social media posts, music streaming upload sites like Soundcloud (34 followers), his YouTube channel (117 subscribers) and other user submitted content. The lengthly quote section in the article contains gems like "It’s a profound endeavor of mine to encapsulate depth, minimize verbosity, and evoke maximal impact." going on to later state "Within the zenith of cognitive eminence, the amalgamation of perspicacity and esoteric lexicon begets an intricate tapestry of ratiocination, where the labyrinthine profundities of ratiocinative acuity coalesce, elucidating an intellectual magnum opus that transcends the vicissitudes of linguistic and cerebrally rigorous terrains." I'm not sure what that means but it sounds important. This WP:AUTOBIO is a good example of WP:SPIP and WP:PROMO and fails to meet notability criteria for WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Netherzone (talk) 04:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * As to alternatives to deletion, to quote the artiste themself, "Where deficiency persists, prowess must thrive in alternative domains." Netherzone (talk) 16:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Perhaps even speedy. G11 with a mix of hoax. Wanky self promotional twaddle lacking coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an overtly promotional article that makes broad claims of fame and influence that are entirely unsupported by factual evidence. Such evidence needs to be presented in the form of references to reliable published sources that are entirely independent of the performer and that also devote significant coverage to the performer. The closing administrator will disregard the ill-informed comments by IPs and new accounts in this discussion that show no understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cullen328 (talk) 07:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Love the quotes section though. Will use for next scrabble game. --Ouro (blah blah) 07:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * • Keep. - User is stating biased perspective, about potentially stealing the author's quotes, from this deleted page, making him suitable, due to risk of it being stolen or impersonated by others as well.
 * He is at massive risk for confusion, and needs a individual page highlighting what he is known for, for database and clarity. Dantecolombo4 (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found absolutely nothing in terms of secondary sources. Promotional content can be fixed, but without sources to show notability, there's no point. Owen&times; &#9742;  13:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Retain/Keep That is a untrue statement. There are Numerous secondary sources, analyzing and describing his music.
 * https://oldtimemusic.com/w3/the-meaning-behind-the-song-too-fast-by-capo-geezy/
 * https://oldtimemusic.com/w2/the-meaning-behind-the-song-demon-girl-by-capo-geezy/
 * https://www.last.fm/music/Capo+Geezy/+wiki
 * Example. Capogeezy90 (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet notability requirements. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  15:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable at all per Wikipedia's criteria. I'm not even sure it's a serious article. ... disco spinster   talk  16:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Retain.
 * The deletion of the page dedicated to Capo Geezy would be an unwarranted action, disregarding the impact and recognition he has garnered within the music industry. Capo Geezy is not merely a public figure but a distinguished musical artist whose contributions have resonated widely, reaching audiences globally, particularly in the United States, and in certain regions of Europe and Africa. His appeal spans a broad age range, captivating listeners from 5 to 30 years old, attesting to his versatility and the universal appeal of his music.
 * A critical point of contention, the SoundCloud page previously cited with only 34 followers, has been mistakenly linked to Capo Geezy. It is imperative to clarify that this page was, in fact, a fan-made account responsible for leaking his music, and not an official representation of his digital presence. Such an error underscores the importance of verifying the authenticity of sources when evaluating an artist's digital footprint.
 * Furthermore, Capo Geezy's collaborations with notable figures in the music industry, such as Pooh Shiesty and Juice WRLD, among others, signify his standing and influence within the rap and hip-hop scenes. These collaborations are not merely casual affiliations but are indicative of his skills, creativity, and the respect he commands among his peers.
 * The recognition of Capo Geezy's lyrics on platforms such as Genius and Old Time Music further cements his position in the music world. Genius, in particular, is renowned for its comprehensive and authoritative coverage of music lyrics and artist backgrounds, serving as a critical resource for fans and researchers alike. The presence of Capo Geezy's work on such a platform speaks volumes about his artistic merit and the impact of his music.
 * In light of the aforementioned points, it is clear that Capo Geezy's contributions to the music industry and his wide-reaching influence are both significant and well-documented. Removing his page would not only overlook the factual evidence of his prominence but also diminish the resourcefulness of the platform for music enthusiasts seeking information about influential artists. Therefore, it is in the best interest of accuracy and completeness to retain the page dedicated to Capo Geezy, ensuring that his artistic legacy is appropriately recognized and preserved for current and future audiences. Capogeezy90 (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. . It's continued presence on our platform is not just beneficial; it's essential for his fans in the states and europe to gather proper information about him for a multitude of reasons. He is very known, but controversial and there needs to be a factual page about him that is neutral or close to it. Dantecolombo4 (talk) 16:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Now I'm sure it's not serious. ... disco spinster   talk  17:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The tool to check for AI generated content is "highly confident" that this was written by AI, with 2% written by a human. Netherzone (talk) 01:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - looks like we've got a couple more ducks have flown in that are quacking "Amidst, the nebulous maelstrom of existential quandaries, wherein the ephemeral dance of circumstance intertwines with the enigmatic tapestry of perception, let us unfurl the ineffable, essence of ontological inquiry, and imbue the labyrinthine corridors of cognition with the transcendental symphony of epistemological exploration." I agree this may be a hoax. Netherzone (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If there's anything I must thank them for it would for teaching me all these new words. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * • Comment. - To address concerns regarding professionalism and bias, especially when discussing quotes by Capo Geezy, it's essential to approach the topic with a balanced and respectful perspective. This involves acknowledging the importance of preserving the integrity of the article while carefully examining the significance of his quotes. In doing so, we strive to maintain a professional demeanor, ensuring that our discussion is free from bias and respects the contributions of Capo Geezy to the discourse at hand. By focusing on the content and context of his statements, we can provide a comprehensive analysis that honors the value of his words without compromising the standards of professionalism. Dantecolombo4 (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The tool to detect AI/LLC shows it is 97% confident that this comment was AI generated. Netherzone (talk) 01:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find a single reliable source referencing him or anything he's done, even in passing. There are no news results for him. Anything I can find is either primary, user-generated or not from a reliable source. Shaws username  .  talk  . 20:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable whatsoever. ~ Eejit43</b> ( talk ) 21:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails to meet notability criteria. Johnnie Bob (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quack!!! There's already a billion self-promotional sites out there, so just keep us out of it. Good luck to the dude as he tries to make a living as an influencer by plastering himself all over social media, but I suggest finding a web designer who is better at Photoshop. I once wore a shirt with flower pattern and I know what "epistemological" means, but somehow that has never been reported by reliable media and therefore there is no material with which to build an encyclopedic article about me. But I could say that I'm already an "influential figure" with "pioneering work" and this dude would totally believe me. --- <b style="color:#9932CC"> DOOMSDAYER 520</b> (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable, page is full of obviously false uncited achievements, and this deletion discussion is getting spammed by LLM-written sockpuppets. Quack.FPTI (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.