Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cappai de Bas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Cappai de Bas

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Declined db-hoax. Not an obvious hoax, but I can find absolutely no sources, so there are verifiability issues.  Running On Brains (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There are actually many sources (books) about the House of Bas who were Judges (Giudici, meaning Kings) of Arborea: but no connection with Cappai. But first and foremost, they did not get nobility titles during the middle age:
 * "prince of Arborea" does not exist (the concept of prince maybe, but surely not the title);
 * "count of Villasalto" was granted only in 1681 to Joseph Zatrillas and has been used by that family until they got extinct - source (among others): Dionigi Scano, La nobiltà sarda (1942) (Sardinian nobility), appendix to Donna Francesca Zatrillas, marchesa di Laconi e di Siete Fuentes - ISBN 84-9789-069-8;
 * "marquis of Muravera" has never been granted - source (among others): Francesco Floris, Feudi e feudatari di Sardegna (Fiefs and feudal lords of Sardinia), Cagliari, 1996;
 * "marquis of Villarios" has been first granted in 1647 to Francisco Amat (being an "upgrading" of his previous tile, count of Villanova del Rio: meaning that the title was entirely new) and his descendants have been officially using it since. I already demanded that the use of this title be deleted from an article in the Italian wiki.


 * According to F. Floris and S. Serra, Storia della nobiltà in Sardegna (History of nobility in Sardinia, 1986), a Capay family actually got a grant of kight and Noble, but only in 1617 and absolutely no fiefs (p. 205).


 * Several others books and documents state the same facts. That is why I ask for the deletion of false content. Thank you. --Vadsf (talk) 00:53, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)




 * It appears as none is interested in such a false article... :)--Vadsf (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Any material, especially if it triggers questions, should be sourced. The author is not active, and since there are reasonable doubts, the article should be deleted by the end of the week provided no sources have been added.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The veracity of the article has been questioned and no reliable sources have been produced to prove accuracy. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 23:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.