Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capt Thomas J Lee

Capt Thomas J Lee
Wikipedia is not a genealogy site. --jpgordon{gab} 04:53, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable.  Bad title, too.  RickK 05:18, Nov 23, 2004 (UTC)
 * DELETE Why is this even recommended for cleanup? --ExplorerCDT 05:51, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * DELETE Of no educational value. User:Marine 69-71
 * Delete. jni 08:11, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. AtonX 12:56, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: In the south, everyone is "related to Robert E. Lee" and everyone is "part Indian." This article is true genealogy.  Probably a mistaken assumption about Wikipedia by the author.  Geogre 14:41, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) (Not related to Robert E. Lee, and only 1/32nd Indian.)
 * Delete; Wikipedia is not a genealogy site. I think this material would be OK for a user page if the contributor wanted to create an account, but it is not appropriate as an encyclopedia article in the main namespace. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 02:33, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. This looks like first-person original research.  &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:08, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk) ]] 06:23, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Bart133 16:54, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)