Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain (2019 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Captain (2019 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM and the last paragraph of NFF. Fails GNG by a mile or so, with typical routine trivial entertainment-spam-coverage.

The second-ref self-describes itself to be a gossip-zine. And, the spam-quotient of the third-reference is self-explanatory from it's literary style.

Some more routine-trivial coverage (first song has been released, first look has been released, film-shooting is about to commence) which smacks of PR-stuff have been added.

Since that does not satisfy NFILM in any manner, I suppose that the creator is making a case for GNG. In that case, it may be prudential to note that GNG demands   &#x222F; WBG converse 14:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Just an personal attack and all the sources provided are independent and reliable sources. And it meets notability. Azkord (talk) 14:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


 * delete see wp:crystal.Slatersteven (talk) 19:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. We don't yet know if the film will meet film notability criteria because the fulfilment of said criteria usually come after the release.  Sure, if it's the next Avengers movie then go ahead, but that's because there's so much media coverage already that the film passes general notability guidelines, which supersedes subject-specific notability guidelines.  The same can't be said for this film.    SITH   (talk)   23:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.