Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Citrus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Aoidh (talk) 07:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Captain Citrus

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PRODded by with with concern issues not addressed for nearly 7 years; promotional character, only 'source' is created by interested party., then deprodded by  for alleged mass PROD, but then reinstated by BoomboxTestarossa. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 15:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC) :Delete as no notable independent sources, probably even tenuous to link it back to Not That Ralph Macchio unless that page somehow contextualises a random mascot within his career. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 16:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 15:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep the announcement in 2014 received a lot of coverage, particularly in Florida but also in some national media like WSJ and adweek:, , , , , , . Most mentions post-2014 are very passing mentions: , . However, there are a few multi-paragraph mentions  and at least one entire article: Bouffard, K. (2015, Mar 30). 'Captain citrus': OJ sales fall more slowly; is it heroic? The Ledger Retrieved from . And, perhaps surprisingly, a paper, although not very cited but still a published paper: Promoting Commodities through Comic Books: A Framing Analysis of the Captain Citrus Campaign. Journal of Applied Communications. 2016. I was going to vote delete probably but this is significantly more mainstream coverage of a comic book character than normal, even if it was mostly an ad-push, there was still some following on coverage. Skynxnex (talk) 13:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's good stuff! I wonder what I was doing wrong to not see that. It needs an overhaul but yes, definitely salvageable. How do I go about changing my vote? Do I edit the first one or just post Keep? =) BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @BoomboxTestarossa WP:DISCUSSAFD has some instructions but generally: I've also see people strike their vote and then do their new vote in a different comment. Skynxnex (talk) 14:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 13:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @Skynxnex thanks, appreciate the patience! =) Keep per sources listed, apologies all around. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 14:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Consider the revision of the page as my penance for the premature nomination and as a thanks to @Skynxnex for the sources. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.