Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Hareblower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. I would probably have opted to delete or merge myself. But the consensus is clear. DES (talk) 06:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Captain Hareblower

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

At the very least should be merged to Bugs Bunny. However, don't think that it's either notable enough for it's own article, not is it well written enough for a merge. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite. Created by Friz Freleng. (If you don't know who this is, congratulations! You haven't misspent your youth.) IMDb entry gives it a pretty high rating. Clarityfiend 16:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * So? Friz Freleng directed a LOT of shorts: what makes this special? --Calton | Talk 14:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree, it needs a rewrite. But Looney Tunes is at least as deserving of entries for each episode as many of the TV shows that have them. -- BPMullins | Talk 21:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've trimmed it down. Clarityfiend 21:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep most Looney Tunes shorts by the likes of Freling, Jones, and McKimson are inherently notable. This article needs a bit of work, though. DarkAudit 23:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 01:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.   -- --sparkit TALK  02:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This ain't IMDB-Lite, and unless you've got some reliable sources actually discussing this specific cartoon and its impact/meaning/history/whatever, you've got bupkis. --Calton | Talk 14:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with List of Bugs Bunny cartoons per WP:EPISODE - As soon as it becomes notable, it can have its own article. Needless to say, this probably goes for much of the list's material - Tiswas (t) 13:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.