Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain of the Secret Base Openweight Tag Team Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:52, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Captain of the Secret Base Openweight Tag Team Championship

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotion fails to meet WP:GNG, so the titles derivatives also don't meet GNG. All sources are WP:PRIMARY. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 17:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete — Fails WP:GNG, no coverage in reliable sources. StaticVapor message me!   17:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The promotion is notable enough as it is an offspring promotion of the Toryumon System that has been regularly featuring many known veterans of the Japanese independent pro-wrestling scene such as Bear Fukuda, Mad Paulie, Men's Teioh, Mototsugu Shimizu, Tetsuhiro Kuroda and even Suzuki-gun member DOUKI for a decade. More independent sources have been provided from Cagematch.net, a website often used in various Wikipedia pages about pro-wrestling promotions or championships. Cordially, MordecaiXLII. 00:43, August 6, 2019 (CEST)
 * - please see WP:NOTINHERIT. Subjects don't gain notability from notable subjects. Cagematch doesn't help to prove notability, it's only to be used to verify match results, per WP:PW/RS. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * - How does anything gain notability, then? The Cagematch sources were just adressing the WP:PRIMARY. To me, the three articles now meet the WP:GNG criteria. Cordially, MordecaiXLII. 08:30, August 6, 2019 (CEST)
 * You need to add significant content from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Things like it being mentioned in the news, magazine clippings, or reviews from 3rd parties. not everything is suitable for a Wikipedia page.Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not appear to meet WP:GNG -  Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk  15:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Well I have been defeated. The thought police hath struck again. Hope you managed to get off from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MordecaiXLII (talk • contribs) 15:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Fails WP:GNG. Barca (talk) 17:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - If the promotion is deleted under it's AfD, this has to follow as well. Addicted4517 (talk) 02:57, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the article because it fails WP:GNG.Forest90 (talk) 12:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.