Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture ready (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 19:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Capture ready
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be WP:OR, combining synthesis from primary source documents, and even referencing another Wikipedia article. Also, see prior AfD on this, though this version seems different enough from that one not to be a speedy - though I would not object if another admin feels differently on that. Cirt (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom violated no original research. JBsupreme (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The article seems to present no new information other than what is offered on Carbon capture and storage and links to a particular commercial site in China. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--I can't remember if the first version (which I voted delete on) had these footnote references. What continues to make me vote NO is that the tone of the article is entirely unencyclopedic (it reads like an OR essay), that it is incoherent and does not even attempt to define what it is talking about, and that the matter is covered well enough in Carbon capture and storage. In other words, I pretty much agree with everything said above. Drmies (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant, and then redirect to Carbon capture and storage as possible search term. -Atmoz (talk) 03:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.