Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarNAVi Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:05, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

CarNAVi Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP. All but one of the sources in the article don't pass WP:RS, and quite a few are press releases. The best source listed is this one, but this isn't really enough coverage to base an article on. This article was previously deleted via PROD and G11, but was recreated. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 10:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with the nominator, I've searched but everything I can find is either a press release or primary source - it may not help that carNavi throws up lots of generic hits not related to the company, but I'm pretty satisfied that there won't at this time be enough to meet WP:GNG nonsense  ferret  15:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete fails CORP. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.