Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarProperty.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

CarProperty.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

does not meet wp:references and also WP:notability Shrikanthv (talk) 15:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - has received significant coverage in the Detroit News, New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune --Hirolovesswords (talk) 20:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * - Are there any more? What I found at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam were only trivial mentions, hardly enough for a solidly notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  21:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * - See "Real estate for wheels". York Daily Record. November 30, 2008. and Roy, Rex. "Recession Reality: Cheap Garages To Go With Cheap Cars?". The Car Connection. May 19, 2009. (also shown on The Huffington Post). --Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now currently at best as my searches found nothing better than a few other passing mentions albeit from major notable news sources at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam. SwisterTwister   talk  21:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep the linked NY Times and Chicago Tribune articles are not "trivial mentions" or passing references they're articles about the site itself.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 23:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Examples of trivial or passing mentions would be like these:--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - has received significant coverage in Road & Track, and Inman News --Carguy.Barnes (talk) 09:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Examples of trivial or passing mentions would be like these:New York PostInternational Business Times--Carguy.Barnes (talk) 9:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. My gut tells me Delete, but I have to admit the NYTimes and Chicago Tribune sources meet our requirements.  -- RoySmith (talk) 05:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.