Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarSwitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

CarSwitch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only some routine coverage like fundraising news. Some of the sources are copy of each other proving them to be press release. Mar11 (talk) 17:15, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - agree, not notable. Shritwod (talk) 18:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * delete very obviously a paid editing job placed here to gain visibility for the company. Fails N. Jytdog (talk) 20:45, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete promo article, which has no enclyclopedic knowledge to the average reader, as except as a business listing. Reads like a brochure. scope_creep (talk) 20:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Has the usual "tells" of undisclosed paid editing, such as the emphasis on corporate fundraising. No evidence of notability that I can see -- just a place that sells used cars. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 22:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough indepth coverage L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  12:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as native advertising apparently created in violation of our terms of use. This is not a Wikipedia article but an advertisement masquerading as one. However,, this is not the same business model as an ordinary used-car dealer or website – it is an apparently new and probably notable service where the agent inspects and certifies the car. But even if we had a page on it, I doubt if a company as small as this would merit a mention in it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.