Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Car insurance in Ireland (third nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Car insurance in Ireland


I am sending this back to AfD. Nothing is being done to improve this. Just empty promises of improvement. It is clearly original research and I fail to see how this qualifies as encyclopedia material. An essay for school maybe... but not an article in an encyclopedia. MartinDK 09:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, since it feels as though something could be done if someone who knew enough about the topic took to it. That said, the fact that they haven't (even though there's been a bumpy AfD history) would suggest that knowledge and wherewithal aren't found in combination. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article hasn't improved at all since it was first nominated for AfD. -Anþony (talk) 10:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with the first AfD &mdash; there is room for an informative, well-sourced encyclopaedia article on the subject of car insurance in Ireland but this is not it and, looking at the history, it's not going to be it any time soon. Delete. Demiurge 10:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Scrape clean and start anew. I can see the topic as part of a larger article comparing vehicle insurance with various countries, but the one that is presented here seems to have hit a dead end. Time to put this version out of its misery. B.Wind 11:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete see Articles for deletion/Car insurance ireland for an earlier debate that was closed as no consenssus. The second nomination was closed as keep as being premature so soon after the first.  After two months of no improvement, I am more convinced than ever that this is simply original research that should be deleted.  And thanks to Martin for getting around to nominating this before I got around to it.  Eluchil404 20:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. RobJ1981 20:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Whole bunch of nothing. Yankee Rajput 22:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too much OR. WMMartin 18:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.