Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carafina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. db-banned|1=Orangemoody Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Carafina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable fashion retailer. Sources are SPS, blogs and PR announcements. No better coverage via Google (the name search is conflated with other topics). GermanJoe (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note This article was previously deleted as part of Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Articles-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  15:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am just going through and nominating a whole batch of such re-creations from socks and/or SPA accounts. GermanJoe (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Per above. Article creator appears to be a WP:SPA, only edits have been to the current and previous article of the same name.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  15:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of any notability.  Velella  Velella Talk 19:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Created by an SPA which in my book is enough grounds for deletion. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The creator has been confirmed as an Orangemoody sock. Can this be speedy deleted now? — Brianhe (talk) 00:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.