Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carat UK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 23:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Carat UK

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional article for a media agency, orphaned and unreferenced except for an incestuous award from its own industry. Fails WP:NOT, in particular WP:NOTDIR and WP:ADVERT  Sp in ni ng  Spark  16:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete Spam page for unnotable agency. Lets  drink  Tea  16:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, reluctantly. There is some confusion over names of the various branches, and who owns what, but press coverage for Carat as a media specialist within the UK is fairly substantial. is the Guardian newspaper commenting on the company securing a job with the Telegraph. Then you've got  and, plus  which suggests the FT covered the company. All this, as well as the large amounts of money being mentioned, would suggest to me that the company is notable enough for an article, at least. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 18:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep the coverage found by Jarry1250 is pretty good and implies that there shoudl be more. The article is not G11 spam, though it could use work.  Eluchil404 (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.