Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caravaggio to Canaletto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Caravaggio to Canaletto

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A temporary art exhibit may be notable if it has a lasting impact. This is not evident from the text. Furthermore, the article gives no independent, substantive coverage. I think therefore that the topic fails wp:gng Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 04:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hungary and Italy. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Museums and libraries.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment' I found a handful of reviews but not sure they're enough as they're contemporary with the exhibit and like the non said, don't demonstrate lasting impact. The article itself is almost certainly copypasta from the museum's english website, although the page isn't in any of the internet archives to cross check. Star   Mississippi  14:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, as a routine temporary exhibition such as every gallery and museum holds, all the time. All such exhibitions get press mentions at the time (otherwise no one would know to go to them!) and some get passing mentions in other contexts from time to time afterwards, but for a stand-alone article we need some in depth sourcing. Elemimele (talk) 07:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete I am not finding reliable sources to show why this particular show is notable. There is more coverage about the catalog than the show.--WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.