Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carbon Health


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus verging on keep. Daniel (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Carbon Health

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Being one of the many firms distributing Covid test kits fails NOTNEWS & does not imply notability, and the other references do not meet WP:NCORP  DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets GNG, NCORP. This short article currently has 29 citations; a few of them could be better choices, but this clearly meets "contain significant coverage". Reminder, we shouldn't be using AFD/deletion as an excuse for further clean up. This company doesn't just have COVID test kits, which should be obvious since they were founded in 2015. Joojay (talk) 03:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep agreed might be close to TOO SOON but over the years has accumulated enough notice for me. W Nowicki (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * There are a few good reliable sources, such as Wired UK and the CBS affiliate. However, many of the sources cited are not reliable. A new page should be able to demonstrate notability with only a couple of reliable sources. At this moment, it is only a weak keep. Multi7001 (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.