Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carbon Trends


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Carbon Trends

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation way too soon." Article dePRODded by article creator without any reason given. PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per Randykitty. -Cupper52Discuss! 10:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The journal is new but it has already published 30 articles (it is peer-reviewed and it will be indexed soon -- application pending). It comes from a very reputable publisher (Elsevier). Let me know what else needs to be added to make it acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by P977277 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * How many articles are being published is absolutely irrelevant, as is the fact that the publisher is reputable (WP:NOTINHERITED). An application pending is also irrelevant, as we have no way of predicting whether that application will be successful. The way to handle this is to delete the article as non-notable and only IF it becomes notable in a near or farther future should an article be re-created. --Randykitty (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:TOOSOON, basically. Can be revisited once notability is established. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as too soon and also copyvio, without prejudice against recreation from scratch at a later date. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.