Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiff kook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominator has changed to keep, clearly a far more substantial article then when nominated Ged  UK  12:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Cardiff kook

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Minimal assertion of importance/significance, author objected to proposed deletion --ZhongHan (Email) 00:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC) *Absolutely Delete. Poorly written, no significance, no sources, no hotlinking, etc. Steel Iron Talk 01:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

After vast improvements, I change my vote to keep. Steel Iron Talk 23:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Following significant expansion, this now looks like a pretty obvious keep. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep since now expanded. Is there really a need to nominate articles that have been created 1 day ago, without giving them a chance to grow ? Ezhuks (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Apologies for biting. --ZhongHan (Email) 00:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Substantial coverage, include page one article in The Wall Street Journal. Appears notable. Alanraywiki (talk) 15:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A fine, well-sourced article, suitable for DYK.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.