Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardo (record producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 08:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Cardo (record producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO, little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Of the three sources cited, one link is dead and the other two are the standard Q & A interviews of "up and coming artists" from record magazines. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:COMPOSER. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:TOOSOON. Meatsgains (talk) 22:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I've been watching this article for several months and frankly never found anything to actually suggest its own convincing substance. I had frankly planned to PROD but had not, in case it was removed.... SwisterTwister   talk  05:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG as I can't seem to find any real coverage in reliable sources here. I think it's WP:TOOSOON for an article at the moment, perhaps later on this person might be notable enough for an article.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 06:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article does not have significant information about the subject. Bmbaker88 (talk) 20:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- run of the mill producer and rapper/DJ. Bearian (talk) 19:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Added more credible cites such as MTV and Complex. Subject has produced for noteworthy acts as rihanna, nici minaj and jay-z. Worse case will re-write from scratch if necessary to meet quality. Krealkayln (talk • contribs) 20:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Still not convincing enough and, by all means I would not immediately restart it or else will be deleted as a result of this AfD; I would only wait until at least a few years (at best) have passed and there's better substantial sources. SwisterTwister   talk  00:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.