Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardus Education Survey Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Cardus without prejudice against a selective merge. Owen&times; &#9742;  12:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Cardus Education Survey Canada

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Came across the article on the Christian think tank Cardus today, which appears to be the result of WP:UPE. I stubified that rather than nominate it for deletion because it looks like there's enough out there for WP:ORG. But that led me to this, a long article on one of Cardus's reports, again with no good independent sourcing at all (but a whole lot of text). Wouldn't be surprised if this were UPE too. In any event, if there's a little bit of coverage it can be summarized in the main article. WP:GNG fail here. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Education, Religion,  and Canada. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Selective Merge to Cardus, or possibly redirect. This is far too much detail for an article about a report that doesn't have any secondary sources about the report (just sources about Cardus, or Cardus's funding). Walsh90210 (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, relies almost exclusively on the report itself. Toadspike   [Talk]  10:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete (or merge/redirect) I agree with the sourcing issues mentioned above. --Here2rewrite (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.