Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Care-to-cure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 07:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Care-to-cure

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability not asserted. Sources consist of YouTube and blogs. Reads like an advert.  ♪Tempo  di Valse ♪  17:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete Speedy if possible, A7. Smells of spam as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Letsdrinktea (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 00:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: spam for an apparent good cause but nn student society is still spam. Rd232 talk 02:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It goes against the grain to delete a charity article, but the author here seems to have completely misunderstood what a reliable source amounts to. With sources, and the "word from our sponsors" style cleaned up, it could become acceptable, but I fear that the charity is just too minor for sources to be found.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  12:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.