Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CareDx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

CareDx

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources are all either connected to the company (interviews, press releases, rehashes of press releases) or routine reports. It indicates low notability, especially for a company with nearly 20-year history. Fails WP:GNG, WP:CORPDEPTH.

Also, a new single-purpose account creating perfectly formatted articles for a company and its CEO is a strong indication of undisclosed paid editing. Rentier (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ifnord (talk) 16:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing but WP:ROUTINE coverage in both the article and in searches: database listings, stock reports, press releases, etc. Nothing available to demonstrate passing WP:CORPDEPTH. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.