Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Career Tech High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify and protect the main space page title.‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. This wasn't specifically advocated but I think it will satisfy those editors who state the problem is TOOSOON. I believe most of the promotional content has been removed. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Career Tech High School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable school, not even built yet. Article is a staff directly. There is nothing notable architecturally about the structure as well. Oaktree b (talk) 00:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 00:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT: I tagged this with G11 yesterday which was deleted by . This is nothing but the same copy intended to promote the school. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This is NOT to promote the school, it is notable because it is the first technical school in the Washington County School District (Utah), More info about the school will be added when it becomes available. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 01:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please understand that the lack of information IS the reason it isn't notable, a term with a specific meaning on Wikipedia. Also, please remove all your spurrious use of bolding in this discussion. The only thing that should be bolded is your !vote. As several have noted, this article is WP:TOOSOON. You can add a small amount of content to the sxhool district's article now, provided you back it up with reliable independent secondary sources, but lists of names of staff or students will never be appropriate either in the SD article or an eventual separate article on this school.  69.92.163.38 (talk) 03:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Utah.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - This reads like a promotional article, with puffery about "learning pathways". It fails WP:NSCHOOL besides. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 15:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Well this is a notable school because it is the First Technical School in Washington County School District (Utah). If you don't like the wording then please help make the wording better. (This is NOT a promotional article) PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That by itself doesn't establish notability, and the use of primary sources doesn't inspire confidence either. If you're certain if the notability of this establishment, then wait until secondary sources confirm it. TheInsatiableOne (talk) 08:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - (again) G11 and salt. WP:TOOSOON. When notability can be established, let the creator go through AfC. BTW, I removed the staff directory. 69.92.163.38 (talk) 16:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)


 * This is a notable school, as it is the first technical school in Washington County School District (Utah). PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 01:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Notability hasn't been established by secondary sources, and the article itself reads like a sales pitch. May also be WP:TOOSOON TheInsatiableOne (talk) 12:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You may be conflating your rather subjective real world view of what notable means with Wikipedia's more objective policy on notability. Please read the link and try to understand that your stated reason for notability isn't a reason at all. 69.92.163.38 (talk) 03:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:TOOSOON. Uhai (talk) 10:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Part of me is sympathetic to the article—once the school opens, it will almost certainly be notable, and it's opening in this coming school year. In the grand scheme of things, all due respect to WP:TOOSOON, I probably wouldn't participate in a deletion debate when the only argument is "nuh uh! this article has to be created next month" (well, okay, in five months) . But that isn't the only argument in favor of deletion. I took a shot at adding some secondary sources to the article ... and I could only find one—from a considerably small local-news source (no disrespect to small local-news sources!). And one February 2023 article on WSCD's "Career & Technical Education Month" didn't even mention the school! If there were more coverage on the school's construction or the decision to create the school or anything, I'd lean towards keep. But, given the dearth of secondary sources, I think we just have to delete and wait.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * What if we added in The Article that More information would immediately be added when it becomes available????.
 * Or if there is a way to change it to a draft, I would be willing to to that, then when more info comes I could add it then resubmit it. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's not even the lack of information that's the real problem. There are many stubs which don't have much content, yet are kept. The issue here is the article lacks neutrality, reading like a sales pitch for the most part, and fails to establish notability. TheInsatiableOne (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you're interested in saving the article content for use later, you could always keep it in your user space. I.e., make a page like User:PaulGamerBoy360/Career Tech High School and then copy and paste the article as it currently stands to it.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks i did that. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 18:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Change To Draft- Too soon  PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 18:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Too soon PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 18:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I'd have no objection to draftifying this article. I'd strongly urge the creator to read and understand the five pillars, My first article and WP:42. I'd also suggest editing other articles and asking questions at The Teahouse, a Q&A forum especially for new editors. Also, please understand that this draft is likely a year or more out from being an article, as references that only speak to a school's opening are generally not considered enough to show notability. The fact that it's the first tech school in the county will never be a factor in determining its notability. 69.92.163.38 (talk) 23:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Draftify. It is obviously WP:TOOSOON, but according to this article], "2021 will also likely see the building of a new career technical high school that will work in tandem with Dixie State University and Dixie Technical College to help students receive a high school diploma and a certificate for their industry once they graduate." A second article says, "There are also plans to open another school in the southern block of the city. CT High School will be located on River Road and just off state Route 7, the Southern Parkway. The school will focus on career technical training. The opening for this high school has been delayed by two years, from 2021 to 2023, due to construction supply shortages, according to Dunham." Neither source is substantive coverage, but if the WCSD has the funds allocated and supply chain issues are the hold-up, we should be seeing more coverage in the near future. — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 18:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.