Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Career Toppers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Career Toppers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

90% of the article's content breaks WP:NPOV and WP:ADVERT and even if it was pared back to a stub, I can't see that it meets WP:ORG. TheDragonFire (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources. Fails GNG/ORG. Lourdes  15:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant coverage. Fails WP:ORG. SL93 (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: A promotional-tone article on a business, sourced only to a case-search page. Searches, including the tailored Wikiproject India search, are locating no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 06:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete lying through teeth when it says honoured by supreme court. Supreme court of India doesnt honour easily, it is a rare incident. If someone/some body gets honoured it automatically gets media coverage. All the refs I could find about it were added by the company itself. — usernamekiran (talk)  18:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.