Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Career abuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Career abuse
Neologism coined by a website trying to make money off of this phenomenon, no notability. Mango juice talk 13:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Per above, and the article is v. POV. Icewolf34 13:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A quick Google search reveals other uses of the term; I don't think this website actually coined it. But it doesn't quite meet notability standards and is still a WP:NEO. Scorpiondollprincess 13:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it's spam. Makes a good sandwich, not a good article. WilyD 13:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom. Travislangley 21:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.