Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Careers in Optics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Careers in Optics

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Personal essay, mixed in with elements of promotion. Anything even remotely connected with this topic is amply covered in encyclopedic style at Optometry. Shadowjams (talk) 11:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC) Delete Nothing new, and see Careers in Optics Working Group by same editor.TheLongTone (talk) 12:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note - the OP's name suggests that it's a corporate entity. 11:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC):
 * Comment - Gnews search gives some hits leading to coverage in independent sources, usually mentioned together with 'Careers in Optics Working Group'. But I doubt it is sufficient to satisfy notability requirements. I think you should put them together in one AfD, as editors are not likely to respond to both. Both pages are created by a new editor "Wordsandpicturesltd", which suggests a connection with the industry. MakeSense64 (talk) 13:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Already covered in optometry. Nothing worth merging. -- Whpq (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The article text is basically a Copyvio of the text bubbles on this site. AllyD (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * delete - wikipedia is not a how-to manual. --Karl.brown (talk) 16:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-encyclopaedic career guide. AllyD (talk) 19:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.