Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cargolux Flight 7933


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 21:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Cargolux Flight 7933

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable incident. William 21:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  -William 21:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.  -William 21:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -William 21:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Bizzare incident but not notable enough for its own article. Worth mentioning in the airport article but fails WP:AIRCRASH/WP:GNG for a stand-alone. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although WP:Aircrash would seem not to apply to this accident, I believe that it does pass WP:GNG. It is established and verified that both aircraft and vehicle had permission to be on the active runway, so there was a major ATC mess-up somewhere. The investigation is still ongoing, and we are awaiting the final report to be released. Mjroots (talk) 09:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Two years later and a final report is still being waited on for a minor accident. It's much more likely to have been done and forgotten. Especially in light of this report on Luxembourg's last fatal incident. It took 13 months for it to be issued. Why would it take two years in this case?- William 13:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Two years plus is not unusual. It took over 8 years before the final report came out in respect of Crossair Flight 850. Mjroots (talk) 14:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Different country, entirely different type of incident. If we want to do that comparison, how about the crash that killed those hockey players last year? The final report was out in 3 months. The other incident I cited took place in Luxembourg as did Cargolux so the comparisons would be more relevant. This Cargolux incident deserves nothing more than a note in the airport article. How historically important is it?- William 15:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete doesnt appear to be notable for a stand-alone article just a mention in the airport article. MilborneOne (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Simply not notable as per WP:AIRLINES notability guidelines.--Jetstreamer (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.