Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caribbean Canadian Chemical Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Caribbean Canadian Chemical Company

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of any reliable, secondary sources establishing notability. Very few ghits, and no gnews results. OSbornarfcontribs. 02:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as the A7 decliner; I was actually going to PROD it myself. The claim of notability is enough to pass A7, but I agree with this AfD nomination.  The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 04:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment This article suggests that they might have been involved in a 1996 distribution of tainted cough medicine that killed a bunch of people in the slums. I couldn't find any other reference to this though, so there role may have been only minimal.  A french/creole search may turn up more results.  Ravendrop 13:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep The poisoning incident is also covered in a short chapter in a book about the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Epidemic Intelligence Service program: Inside the Outbreaks: The Elite Medical Detectives of the Epidemic Intelligence Service, pages 300, 301, Mark Pendergrast, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Anarchangel (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete As per other arguments, non-notable, no real substantial coverage in reliable sources.--Yaksar (let's chat) 01:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.