Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caribbean News Now


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Caribbean News Now

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has only one source that reads like an advertisement on a non-english website, was created by an editor with a COI, and is not notable. Tarage (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Woodroar (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The Wikipedia article is worded quite similar to an article in Rozenberg Quarterly. This might be coincidence, but still. Kleuske (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- non notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I frankly consider this G11 material through and through, nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.