Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carina Damm (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Carina Damm
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:MMABIO criteria as she only has 1 fight in a top tier promotion. Also fails WP:GNG as her fight coverage is mainly through routine sports report.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 16:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Has only one top tier fight, a loss, and thus fails to meet WP:NMMA. Coverage is generally routine sports reporting.  The only possible exceptions are on her being banned for testing at 20x the allowable level for steroids and about her subsequently submitting a fake urine sample.  These days, I would say even that is fairly routine for sports reporting and I would call it insufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Subject fails WP:NMMA for not having at least 3 fights under the top tier promotions for he has only 1 fight under UFC and fails GNG for fight info is merely routine reports. Cassiopeia  talk  00:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.