Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carishma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 03:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Carishma

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable musical artist that is currently the subject of a wide-scale advertising blitz but who has little or no press coverage. Fails to satisfy WP:MUSIC. Mgcsinc (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are plenty of stubs out there. As said in the article, Carishma knows a few important people in the business. Kim Kardashian had a stub after her relationship with Ray J went rather public, and nobody commented on that. Carishma might work her way up the fame ladder before anyone knows it. Besides, how many Snap-On Feathers commercials have been played over and over on our TVs? Trust me, this girl will go big. I will try to add more information. I don’t want to be too hasty with my decision but I vote on KEEP for now. Mattie604 (talk) 22:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I might have been too hasty with my decision. I added a few more details, but it was hard to find details on this person. Like I said, she might become a bigger star especially with her starring on all of the Snap-On Feathers commercials. I'd like to contact this user because I have found a wrong fact-on Carisha's MySpace it states she is 21 years old, which would mean she was born in 1990 but here it says she was born on 1995. Mattie604 (talk) 23:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails both specific WP:MUSICBIO guideline (a commercial for something with a Wordpress blog, how special) and general WP:GNG/WP:BIO with no coverage in reliable sources. "Keep" argument above is WP:CRYSTAL; we don't keep articles on non-notable people around just in case they might become famous in a few years or decades. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 23:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet WP:MUSIC and lacks any notability QU TalkQu 23:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy - After searching, just not finding coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The non-notable argument is rather weak, and as far as stubs go, this is decently sourced.Pectoretalk 05:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Just noting that the basis of this nomination is not that the article is underdeveloped or undersourced (although the sources are generally primary sources); this is a notability AfD. An article on a non-notable subject, even if it is sourced to high heaven, still merits deletion. - Mgcsinc (talk) 07:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Insufficient coverage to establish notability. She might "go big", but in the meantime, she hasn't. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.