Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caritamo Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Caritamo Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No unaffiliated reliable sources, as required by the general notability guideline. All I saw searching were a few business registries (not much better than the phone book) before Google started suggesting items featuring similar results. No news results, no scholar results. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I searched on Google, Google news, Google scholar and DuckDuckGo. I found nothing other than the new Wikipedia article, a Facebook page and a business registry. Since there are few results even when a similar name is included, it does not take long to go through full search results. For an organization which allegedly began in 2003 (but was only "officially" founded in 2016 - however that can be), it has garnered no verifiable coverage showing notability that can be found on the search engines. Donner60 (talk) 04:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NCORP. This may be a WP:TOOSOON situation if the foundation was just created. shoy (reactions) 19:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a business directory on which every organization that exists at all gets an automatic inclusion pass; it's an encyclopedia, where an article is earned on the basis of sufficient reliable source coverage to get the topic over WP:ORG. But there's no RS coverage shown (or, per above commenters, even locatable) here. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when sourceability improves. Bearcat (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ORG. I can find no independent reliable sources that cover this group. Meters (talk) 05:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.