Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl's Stone Cold Lock of the Century of the Week


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The arguments for deletion outweigh the reason for retention for given. That being said, if someone wishes to merge, please let me know and I will be able to facilitate that. –MuZemike 06:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Carl's Stone Cold Lock of the Century of the Week

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for web content. Neelix (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Non-notable. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  23:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. This is a popular sports feature, well known to NFL fans in particular, and it appears regularly on national sports broadcasts and on ESPN radio, TV, and web.   It has wide recognition in the sports blogosphere.  On the other hand, as accurately noted by the nominator, it is not easy to find web coverage in reliable sources other than ESPN.  Is the ESPN coverage sufficiently "independent"?  I can see arguments both ways on that.  If we are left with the conclusion that it's not worthy of its own article, I'd still think it would be appropriate to preserve some of this content by merge to a suitable location, maybe at Carl Brutananadilewski or one of the other Aqua Teen Hunger Force pages.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as having insufficient coverage in independent third-party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Arxiloxos and the numbers according to Adult Swim (it averages approximately 30,000 viewers per video). This needs to be cleaned up, not deleted. Beyond495 (talk) 03:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.