Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl-Fredrik Algernon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn as heading to speedy keep. LibStar (talk) 00:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Carl-Fredrik Algernon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:BIO. lack of significant third party coverage. whilst rear admiral is a high naval rank, that in itself isn't enough to establish notability. LibStar (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  09:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject was not just a rear admiral, they were a lead investigator in the Bofors scandal who died violently during the investigation.  There appear to be several independant sources available on GBooks.  Edward321 (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Edward321. /Slarre (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Completely nonsensical nomination! Rear Admiral, head of an indepenent government agency, and one of the figures in a much publicised scandal. Absolutly no lack of sources. "Sources" is not equal to googling for English language online sources. Tomas e (talk) 21:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * please assume good faith, google news includes some (but not all) foreign language sources. LibStar (talk) 00:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: per Edward321. Iowateen (talk) 03:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.