Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Cashman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Carl Cashman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a local councillor who fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. Number  5  7  08:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:POLOUTCOMES indicates municipal (inc. councillors) shouldn't be kept unless they have coverage "beyond the scope of what would ordinarily be expected for their role" - a flick through the sources indicates that isn't the case. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Politicians at the municipal level are not handed an automatic WP:NPOL pass just for existing, but this is not referenced to particularly substantive coverage about him for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG: apart from his own self-published website about himself, the only other references here are the exact same routine tables of raw election results that every single person who ran in the election at all could show regardless of whether they won or lost. This is not what it takes to make a borough councillor notable for that. Bearcat (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete despite the fact that even the quickest gNews search shows an unusual amount of press interest in a LibDem city council member, it is too little, perhaps merely  WP:TOOSOON for an  article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.