Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Peters (film)




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: I have speedily deleted this page. It was an empty page. A CSD tag was removed four days ago and replaced with hangon, but despite the promise to write "an explanation of the grounds for contesting the speedy deletion", neither such an explanation nor any attempt to add even a word's worth of content has been made in these last 4 days. The title appears to indicate this German film, but in a quick search I was unable to find any sources that may be used to write an article of encyclopedic value. Should the page's creator (or anyone else) be able to do so, they are welcome to try. In the meantime, however, the encyclopedia is under no obligation to hold non-encyclopedic article pages. —'' Encephalon 04:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Carl Peters (film)
No content in original; was flagged for speedy deleting, then speedy tag was removed but no content was added... Valrith 01:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'll add some content regarding the film; it appears notable. --  tariq abjotu  (joturner) 01:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Never mind; I'm having trouble finding what to write. Its IMDB entry and New York Times page threw me off. --  tariq abjotu  (joturner) 01:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * If he's adding stuff, that's good, but for the record, a removed speedy can be re-added if it still qualifies as CSD (this still does as of my comment). Only prods should not be re-added, but sent to afd instead. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 01:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: It's empty and a test article.  That's a quick one.  The author wants to keep it, but he's not willing to actually write a single word?  Well, that's not really something we can address.  Geogre 04:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.