Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Schmitt (lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Carl Schmitt (lawyer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - As per nom, subject is not notable, lacking sufficient coverage to trace and describe the subject. Eduemoni↑talk↓  18:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject's published dissertation and subsequent career as a lecturer and then working lawyer do not appear to provide evidence of biographical notability. (For anyone searching, it is worth noting that this person was not the German constitutional theorist and law professor, on whom much secondary literature has been published over the past 25 years.) AllyD (talk) 18:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing my standards. Sadly, it appears he did not live long enough to get tenured or to publish such a body of work as to be noted as an expert. Bearian (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.