Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Steenstrup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. DS 20:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Carl Steenstrup
Is this guy notable enough? RedRollerskate 00:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Inclined to give interested parties the chance to prove he cuts it as an author. Could be tempting to jump to systemic bias scented conclusions here... don't like the CV vibe in the article but that's a style concern. Dei zio  talk 01:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:PROF, in my opinion. AdamBiswanger1 04:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to pass WP:PROF. Kershner 04:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. He has an importance greater than the average prof. Inter lingua talk 05:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable subject and publications to justify article. Meets WP:PROF and plenty of references to back up claims.--Auger Martel 07:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per all of the above.  Em-jay-es  07:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.