Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Verheyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Carl Verheyen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

article tagged for multiple issues for over a year without improvements. Subject may have little notability, but perhaps if not deleted, jsut merged into another article (perhaps supertramp, although, he seems to be jsut another guitar player and nothing special.. hence why the AFD) Alan  -  talk  04:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 05:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Subject is sufficiently notable with many RS. The problem is this article is not well referenced, and apparently nobody is willing to work on it. BTW: the Afd research tools show he is not "just another guitar player" Annette46 (talk) 15:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Keep Subject is clearly notable based on a simple Google search, and problems with the article do not constitute justification for deleting it, just for improving it. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  06:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep Well known and in-demand session musician as well as a member of Supertramp. Certainly independently notable. Poor article though.Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 12:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.