Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Wharton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Sourcing critiques from the Delete comments are very plausible, as spot-checking confirms many of the sources are passing mentions. The Keep commenters did not highlight any substantial coverage as rebuttal. RL0919 (talk) 10:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Carl Wharton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NACTOR, lacks independent reliable sources. The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  18:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Film. The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable as having played significant roles (not lead) in various notable films that received coverage, as the guideline requires. (His presence in the films is verifiable)- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  14:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO/NACTOR. No WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth with BLP level sources. 22:11, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. He is a notable actor who acted in notable films. SreeNi310817 (talk) 11:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete no in-depth, significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources as TimothyBlue stated above. I'd like to see more than just the TVGuide source. The TVGuide source is a list of credits and roles, which is not in-depth, significant coverage. The other sources in the article are mere passing mentions and a WP:BEFORE search doesn't convince me that this subject passes GNG. Tails   Wx  19:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting. No additional work has been done on the article so if those advocating Delete have found existing sources don't merit GNG, editors arguing Keep would help their position by providing links to those sources they believe indicate SIGCOV. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes NACTOR: The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films. Flurrious (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: The article needs a clean-up, but he meets WP:NACTOR and is notable enough to have their own article.
 * TheBritinator (talk) 11:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, GNG and NACTOR. His credits do not include notable films. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR, although the films he has appeared seem notable, his roles in them are not significant, only supporting roles that haven't been noted as notable by reliable sources. --Mika1h (talk) 14:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.