Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl choi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Punkmorten (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Carl choi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NOTE, I think. Seems to be autobiographical; orphaned. Prince of Canadat 08:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete no references given, appears promotional. TrulyBlue (talk) 10:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete; non-notable, no references, promotional. Kill it already. Prince of Canadat 00:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  01:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I relisted because the only further info was a !vote from the nom, so it still needs more consensus. That said, I'm not finding any evidence of notability via reliable sources. TravellingCari  01:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a single WP:RS listed, lots of puffery, lack of improvement after relisting. Nuke it. Jclemens (talk) 06:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Clubmarx (talk) 17:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As the visionary and creative brainchild behind the company, Carl is responsible for Plan C's remarkable accomplishments and growth. Sickening. Textbook case of Geogre's Law. JuJube (talk) 01:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.