Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl von Arensdorff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per sources indicated. Also no BLP concern. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 03:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Carl von Arensdorff

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROD decdlined w suggestion to AfD instead: This article has been WP:UNSOURCED for 15 years and fails WP:GNG in every search I could do. Maybe there is a case to merge with Friedrich von Arenstorff, but he seems poorly sourced as well. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sweden. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Denmark, Germany,  and Netherlands.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is some coverage in this book and he may have an entry or partial entry in the 1929 edition of the Svensk uppslagsbok, but I could not find a digitized version of the latter so I'm not sure. A redirect to his notable brother Friedrich von Arensdorff is a suitable WP:ATD. Curbon7 (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The entry in the Dansk Biografisk Leksikon, as well as there being a very good indication of further WP:OFFLINE coverage, seems sufficient to me. There is another much smaller entry in the Den Store Danske Encyklopædi here. Curbon7 (talk) 22:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep a source has been added and inclusion in the Danish DNB indicates notability. Mccapra (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know what "Danish DNB" you are referring to, but one source is usually not considered sufficient per WP:GNG. Agree with Curbon7 tho that if those sources come through he probably would pass it. Allan Nonymous (talk) 21:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I assume you meen keep per WP:ANYBIO 3., did not realize Dansk biografisk Lexikon was a DNB. Allan Nonymous (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Frankly, weak keep per WP:ANYBIO 3. is probably the right call. You can WP:TROUT me for missing this. Allan Nonymous (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.