Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carla Buske


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. Sr13 03:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Carla Buske

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This musician is non-notable. Google search:. I am also listing the other assorted pages relating to her here. nadav (talk) 09:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If she really reached #13 in the charts like the article says, it should be Kept. Could you check this twice? Salaskan 13:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That is a big if. The article says her single reached #1, not #13. She is thirteen years old though apparently. The Canadian Billboard lists are subscriber only, however a search on the billboard site found nothing. Feel free to peruse her myspace site if you are still unconvinced. It lists 14 fans for her.   The Candadian music site Jam! also has nothing about her. This really is open-and-shut. nadav (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If she really reached #13 in the charts like the article says, it should be Kept. Could you check this twice? Salaskan 13:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That is a big if. The article says her single reached #1, not #13. She is thirteen years old though apparently. The Canadian Billboard lists are subscriber only, however a search on the billboard site found nothing. Feel free to peruse her myspace site if you are still unconvinced. It lists 14 fans for her.   The Candadian music site Jam! also has nothing about her. This really is open-and-shut. nadav (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That is a big if. The article says her single reached #1, not #13. She is thirteen years old though apparently. The Canadian Billboard lists are subscriber only, however a search on the billboard site found nothing. Feel free to peruse her myspace site if you are still unconvinced. It lists 14 fans for her.   The Candadian music site Jam! also has nothing about her. This really is open-and-shut. nadav (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) Delete I really would need more time to examine this, but two important indicators are the fact that she's only 13 years old and that her article links only to Myspace. Yechiel Man 13:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as probable hoax. A #1 single in Canada would certainly warrant a listing in allmusic. There isn't any. DarkAudit 16:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * IP editor is now alternatively blanking or removing templates. DarkAudit 21:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep/Delete hmmmm-i'm new to wikipedia and i also created the carla buske articles.carla is a really good friend of mine and yes she does sing.all the information in all of the articles were givin to me by her so ya...you can delete the articles if you want because i don't really care anymore Allison Levesque 18:20, 27 May 2007
 * Speedy Delete as hoax. No ghit outside of WP, so "Oh, Baby" can never have been #1. Malc82 23:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I'll fix everything up tomorrow with factual informatiion about this person Allison Levesque 20:31, 27 May 2007
 * Unacceptable hoaxes do not belong on Wikipedia at any time. DarkAudit 01:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly NN for now and possibly a hoax. gidonb 00:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment We cannot take your word for it, Allison Levesque. Verifiability is achieved through reliable secondary sources, not people who claim to know the subject personally. Delete Adrian   M. H.  19:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete and give a stern warning to editor. Hoaxes are completely unacceptable: they waste everybody's time and they hurt the reputation of Wikipedia. Clearly, the claims in the articles are completely bogus and the least the editor could do when confronted about it is to say: "sorry, won't do it again". Pascal.Tesson 21:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.