Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlo Pellegatti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The sources added by Alienautic have not been challenged, and therefore consensus is that the article should be improved, not deleted. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Carlo Pellegatti

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP does not meet WP:NBIO- lacks coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 02:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete an overly promotional article on a non-notable potato. OK, I just wanted to make my odd joke about Youtubers at some point.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Save Pellegatti's page. As he is a celebrity in Italy and a valuable professional, the proposal for deletion is not understandable. The page could be improved or reviewed, for sure, but deletion would entail a huge lack of precious information. He eventually became a YouTouber, but he is and will always be a widely famous commentator and journalist, that's what he is. He's just a key component of Italian football world. Those collecting information about AC Milan, Italian commentators/journalists, Serie A, etcetera cannot avoid knowing Pellegatti. He must stay on Wikipedia, he's entitled to it. After saying that, please consider his page to be improved or rewied according to Wikipedia's policies and standards. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ITProSpecialOne (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Save Pellegatti's page. Dear John, speaking about Carletto Pellegatti as merely a Youtuber shows that you are expressing a judgment on his presence on Wikipedia without at least knowing what is Carlo's main job, and so the reason why he is so appreciated. Carlo is first of all a great journalist who earned the right to have his own Wikipedia page like some others prominent personality in the history of this profession like Gianni Brera and Beppe Viola. The fact that he uses another medium in order to express himself, his opinions and connect more with his audience (and like for example other journalists like Mauro Suma, Gian Luca Rossi and Stefano Borghi) does not lower his value as a great professional in his field (and I should say it corroborates it). Carletto's page needs to stay on Wikipedia.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete — Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 18:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I tried. I searched online. I emailed friends and family in Italy to help me find significant sources. I have no doubt Carlo is an amazing person and a great journalist but that doesn't get you included in Wikipedia and especially in Wiki:EN. You have to receive significant coverage in independent and reliable sources. Being a well-known sports commentator/journalist from Milan or a youtuber doesn't get you there automatically. My absolute favorite club is Torino FC, of course, but AC Milan has been and is one of my favorites outside of Torino. Please seek additional sources and, if they are found let me know and I will support inclusion. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 20:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - clearly notable. There is in-depth coverage by major newspapers such as Corriere della Sera or La Gazzetta dello Sport.--Alienautic (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep notable per the sources found by Alienautic Nosebagbear (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 18:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:JOURNALIST - Epinoia (talk) 16:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - he actually meets WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO and WP:JOURNALIST. Did you read the references which have been added to the article?--Alienautic (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep notable per Alienautic's sources --HistoricalAccountings (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep profiles in Corriere della Sera and Gazzetta dello Sport are enough to meet the threshold for GNG. Modussiccandi (talk) 21:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.